Comments on: Why photos look bad in Firefox 3.5 (or: one reason why the web sucks) http://insig.ht/2009/11/why-photos-look-bad-in-firefox-3-5/ insig.ht is both quick take and deep dive into the means of making photographs. It’s personal vision, from the inside out; a new, collective way of seeing that’s immediate, original and global. Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:22:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Nathan Soliz http://insig.ht/2009/11/why-photos-look-bad-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-233 Nathan Soliz Sat, 08 May 2010 01:43:43 +0000 http://insig.ht/?p=840#comment-233 <a href="http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/398971" rel="nofollow">http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/398971</a><br><br>Just download the color management addon for 3.5 and you'll select NO Image and everything will be fine :) http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/398971

Just download the color management addon for 3.5 and you'll select NO Image and everything will be fine :)

]]> By: Tweets that mention Why photos look bad in Firefox 3.5 (or: one reason why the web sucks) -- Topsy.com http://insig.ht/2009/11/why-photos-look-bad-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-124 Tweets that mention Why photos look bad in Firefox 3.5 (or: one reason why the web sucks) -- Topsy.com Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:32:26 +0000 http://insig.ht/?p=840#comment-124 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by La Pura Vida Gallery, insig.ht, whileseated2, G Duran, Brooner and others. Brooner said: guess hue! game http://bit.ly/19TAzK (via @insightly: Why photos look bad in Firefox 3.5 or 1 reason why the web sucks) http://bit.ly/1D8e0L [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by La Pura Vida Gallery, insig.ht, whileseated2, G Duran, Brooner and others. Brooner said: guess hue! game http://bit.ly/19TAzK (via @insightly: Why photos look bad in Firefox 3.5 or 1 reason why the web sucks) http://bit.ly/1D8e0L [...]

]]> By: uberVU - social comments http://insig.ht/2009/11/why-photos-look-bad-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-123 uberVU - social comments Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:43:59 +0000 http://insig.ht/?p=840#comment-123 <strong>Social comments and analytics for this post...</strong> This post was mentioned on Twitter by insightly: New insig.ht post: Why photos look bad in Firefox 3.5 (or: one reason why the web sucks) http://bit.ly/1D8e0L... Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by insightly: New insig.ht post: Why photos look bad in Firefox 3.5 (or: one reason why the web sucks) http://bit.ly/1D8e0L...

]]> By: Scott Symes http://insig.ht/2009/11/why-photos-look-bad-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-169 Scott Symes Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:47:40 +0000 http://insig.ht/?p=840#comment-169 Wow, scored an 11 on the hue test which is way better than I figured I’d do and I used the horrible display on my work HP laptop running IE7. I’ve heard that color management on the web is an awful mess but I understand the issue much better now thanks to Hin’s clarification. Still, unless the color errors are glaring, I struggle to understand correct color in a photo. Even in the re-post Hin just put on Flickr, “Cliffe” <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ya588b9" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ya588b9</a> , I mostly see contrast changes although the new scan does look warmer to me.<br>Good thing I like black and white. Wow, scored an 11 on the hue test which is way better than I figured I’d do and I used the horrible display on my work HP laptop running IE7. I’ve heard that color management on the web is an awful mess but I understand the issue much better now thanks to Hin’s clarification. Still, unless the color errors are glaring, I struggle to understand correct color in a photo. Even in the re-post Hin just put on Flickr, “Cliffe” http://tinyurl.com/ya588b9 , I mostly see contrast changes although the new scan does look warmer to me.
Good thing I like black and white.

]]> By: Scott Symes http://insig.ht/2009/11/why-photos-look-bad-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-122 Scott Symes Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:47:40 +0000 http://insig.ht/?p=840#comment-122 Wow, scored an 11 on the hue test which is way better than I figured I’d do and I used the horrible display on my work HP laptop running IE7. I’ve heard that color management on the web is an awful mess but I understand the issue much better now thanks to Hin’s clarification. Still, unless the color errors are glaring, I struggle to understand correct color in a photo. Even in the re-post Hin just put on Flickr, “Cliffe” <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ya588b9" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ya588b9</a> , I mostly see contrast changes although the new scan does look warmer to me.<br>Good thing I like black and white. Wow, scored an 11 on the hue test which is way better than I figured I’d do and I used the horrible display on my work HP laptop running IE7. I’ve heard that color management on the web is an awful mess but I understand the issue much better now thanks to Hin’s clarification. Still, unless the color errors are glaring, I struggle to understand correct color in a photo. Even in the re-post Hin just put on Flickr, “Cliffe” http://tinyurl.com/ya588b9 , I mostly see contrast changes although the new scan does look warmer to me.
Good thing I like black and white.

]]>